Absolutely no plagiarism, must be original and very thorough. Please make sure everything is followed in the question and the grading rubric. Assigned articles are attached, please also use at least one other outside academic resource for each question. Must include in-text citations. Must include specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. No cover page needed but the questions should be separate with their own references. Please provide short but thorough sentences.
Supporting material: Will be uploaded after a tutor is chosen
With regards to the case Medical Equipment Inc. in Saudi Arabia, what are Grover’s options? Is there a way for Grover to accommodate local customs, succeed in his sales endeavors, and take into account any ethical concerns? What would you do in his place and why?
You are a Japanese CEO of a large, multinational car maker based in Japan, and you want to expand your manufacturing operations in the United States. You are looking at various states in the South, including Kentucky, North Carolina and Tennessee. You are concerned about the backlash that your company may experience from Americans who do not like to see a “foreign” company moving into their communities. You are also concerned that Japanese ethical and cultural values are different from American ones.
How would you go about learning “American” ethical and cultural values, as a Japanese CEO, and what are some considerations that you would take into account in the development of a code of ethical conduct at a new American subsidiary?
Let’s connect the dots.
What ties do you see between the two readings from this week and the video? Based on the messages from these authors, what practices would you use to convince a senior person in your organization or the sponsor of your project to implement your recommendations?
Please see grading rubric below. This assignment should be at least 4-5 paragraphs each and very thorough. Make sure you integrate real-life applications to support key points.
Case Discussion Rubric (2016)
Case Discussion Rubric (2016)
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Initial Posting
Initial response displays an excellent understanding of the assigned case, the course readings, and the underlying concepts and includes the correct use of relevant terminology. Initial response additionally integrates specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. Initial response is clear, concise, and compelling.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics
Entirely free of mechanical errors. These include: grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting (font style and size).
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.